Lorenzo Taiuti on Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:28:33 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Josephine Berry-Automatism/Autonomy/Virtual UnconsciousIII |
Dear Josephine
i read your nice essai and i agree on many
things.
About "NN/antiorp/integer" i may only
disagree.
Neither Adorno or Brčton would think that around 2000 people
would try to realize fragile attempts of a web-democracy through contacts,
exchange of informations and attempts of organizations totally free from society
controls.
And i underline "attempts" because what we are tryng to do is
extremely "light" compared to the tremendous weight of the real official
info-structure.
In this moment an interesting list like Syndicate is dyng
because the strategy of "spamming" create by NN&Company breaks the subtle
balance of the "comunication agreement" between members of the
list.
There are not cultural excuses to something like
that.
Ciao
Lorenzo Taiuti
You wrote
"".......It is this precise paralogy
that the anonymous net artist, usually identifiable by the name Antiorp, Netochka Nezvanova or Integer(26), is attracted to, and which it approaches particularly through its play with natural languages and computer programming languages as well as its disruptive interventions in the text-based social environments of mailing lists. In 1998, Antiorp started a campaign of 'spamming'(27) on a wide variety of mailing lists ranging from nettime and 7-11, and those set up to discuss technical matters such as the MAX programming list.(28) Antiorp has, since this time, posted to these lists extensively in a specially developed language termed 'Kroperom' or 'KROP3ROM|A9FF'. This language, in part, relies on a logic of substitution to reformulate the Roman alphabet's phonetic system by including all the 256 different characters comprising the American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), the lingua franca of computing. For instance, in the case of a Kroperom word like 'm9nd', the number '9' is incorporated into the word 'mind' such that the 'ine' in 'nine' takes on a phonetic role. But Antiorp's system also extends beyond purely phonetic substitutions. We can see the broader system of substitutions more clearly in Antiorp's conversion of the term 'Maschinen Kunst' into 'm@zk!n3n kunzt' (the term it uses to describe its oeuvre). Here, for example, the 'a' is substituted for the '@' character, the 'i' for the exclamation point, the 'sch' or 'shh' sound for a 'zk', the 'e' for a '3' and so on. Some of these substitutions, which remain fairly constant within Kroperom, involve finding a key which approximates the inverse of the original character, so that the 'i' becomes an '!' and the '3' replaces the 'e' or 'E'. In some cases these substitutions not only involve finding a close or inverted visual equivalent (e.g. '!' or @) but combine phonetic and visual substitutions in one (e.g. using '3' in place of 'E'). In these instances we can see how the naturalness of the - in this case - German language is infiltrated by ciphers and metaphors of computer code.(29) The exclamation point - which in its new role as the ubiquitous 'i' can dominate whole lines of text - lends Kroperom an emphatic quality and transvalues the whole logic of programming's executable command structure into the oppressive, if comical, tone of the spoken injunction: "do this! do that!". In the example 'm@zk!n3n kunzt m2cht . fr3!' not only do numerals and ASCII characters mix with alphabetic characters within the space of a word, but the unity of the phonetic system is broken by the logic of different character systems so that the reader is forced to employ a combination of strategies to decode the script. This heterogeneous style of encryption and language use not only destabilises the reading process, but triggers multiple lines of cultural, semiotic, and computational association. The act of reading becomes a pointedly self-reflexive and, in the terms of chaos theory, nonlinear experience with each word representing a junction of multiple systems. This point about self-reflexivity can doubtless be made of all textual production and consumption to a greater or lesser extent, but it is important here to emphasis that through, for example, the substitution of letters for numerals, the script starts to mimic the functional potential of a programme. In other words, textual self-reflexivity refers here especially to the computational environment. ......................" |