Phonet][r][ix on 7 Mar 2001 21:53:57 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Nettime-bold] alpha As


At 01:12 PM 7/03/01 +0100, kuni wrote:
>anyway, well, I have to admit the hormonal status
>of the artists themselves was not my point --
>maybe it was more the hormonal status of
>the net.art(.history discussion) in general
>... which is, again, not _that_ directly
>related to the biological
>sex of those participating in the discussion
>on net.art going on here...
>even if one might trace something like that
>between the lines...

hey kuni,

r u re.fur.ring 2 the powah stratification that has
doppel][dubble][gangered itself here ][from rt][? i find he same ol same ol
layered purr.pet][ting][uation of traditional hierarchical codes and winks
here as elsewhere.....those alpha a types d-termined 2 promote N create a
masta race of cloned university-corn-fed academes d-pendent on theory
slices & grandiose proclamations with no ch][r][e][ne][wable creative or
x.pressionistic substance......

       .u can almost smell the history books rubbing 2gether.

 cheerz,
  ][mez][





_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold