Phonet][r][ix on 7 Mar 2001 21:53:57 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Nettime-bold] alpha As |
At 01:12 PM 7/03/01 +0100, kuni wrote: >anyway, well, I have to admit the hormonal status >of the artists themselves was not my point -- >maybe it was more the hormonal status of >the net.art(.history discussion) in general >... which is, again, not _that_ directly >related to the biological >sex of those participating in the discussion >on net.art going on here... >even if one might trace something like that >between the lines... hey kuni, r u re.fur.ring 2 the powah stratification that has doppel][dubble][gangered itself here ][from rt][? i find he same ol same ol layered purr.pet][ting][uation of traditional hierarchical codes and winks here as elsewhere.....those alpha a types d-termined 2 promote N create a masta race of cloned university-corn-fed academes d-pendent on theory slices & grandiose proclamations with no ch][r][e][ne][wable creative or x.pressionistic substance...... .u can almost smell the history books rubbing 2gether. cheerz, ][mez][ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold