Nettime mailing list archives

[Nettime-bold] ASN -2.38 key (fwd)
David Cox on 13 Feb 2001 00:25:52 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] ASN -2.38 key (fwd)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Subject: ASN -2.38 key

	by mr14.vic-remote.bigpond.net.au (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA21319;
	Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:14:48 +1100 (EDT)
Message-Id: < {AT} myspinach.org>
X-Sender: sam {AT} myspinach.org (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:10:14 +1100
To: s11-awol {AT} egroups.com
From: sam <sam {AT} myspinach.org>
Subject: ICANN - Info Alert #1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Status: O
X-UID: 4774

Some have described ICANN as the World Economic Forum of the cyberworld. Others say that  ICANN embodies corporate takeover of the Net. ICANN itself will say that it is a non-profit organisation doing the best it can for the growth of the internet.  ICANN is meeting in Melbourne from March 10 to 13th, 2001. 

The purpose of this email is to encourage further investigation of ICANN. Some of the information presented is speculation and scenario driven - but I feel that there needs to be more people looking at ICANN and its functions. Apologies for its length.
The following has been taken from a variety of sources including www.icann.org and www.icannwatch.org:

On ICANN's website, they describe themselves as: 

    The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is the non-profit corporation that was formed to assume
    responsibility for the IP address space allocation, protocol parameter assignment, domain name system management, and root server
    system management functions previously performed under U.S. Government contract by IANA and other entities. (www.icann.org)

Sounds technical right? Effectively, ICANN controls what is called the Domain Name System (DNS). 

The DNS is what determines how and where content is stored and how it can be accessed by us. For example, ICANN has authority over the top-level domains - the dot-com, dot-org, etc... It was also have authority over setting up new top level domains and specifying how they can be used. Recently, they established a number of new top level domains including dot-biz, however dot-union was rejected. Why?

Please bear with me - ICANN and its functions are complicated and obscure but I think it is important to try and understand what this organisation does. ICANN controls roadmap to cyberspace and has the power to change the map and force us to take different routes to where we want to go, and in some cases to possibily block us from getting there at all. It also has the power to limit and restrict who gets access to uploading content, establishing content (like setting up a campaign site) and who can view this content. The way all of this power and controls will be implemented is not directly by ICANN but indirectly. For example, at the moment, to get a domain name like s11.org costs around US$20 per year - but its possible for this price to increase to US$20,000 - effectively ending the establishment of non-corporate content under a easy-to-find domain. To get around claims of censorship, they would suggest that community groups set up their content using geocities or somethi!
ilar. Not a good solution! There are more scenarios but I hope the one just mentioned is adequate.

The Domain Name System looks like the Holy Grail, the one place where enforceable global Internet policy can be promulgated without any of the messy enforcement and jurisdictional problems that bedevil ordinary law-making exercises on the Net.

Businesses, which now realise the huge economic stake they have in the internet, and governments, which have spent the last few years
worrying about how they would ever get back their taxing and regulatory authority over Internet transactions, will view ICANN as the means to impose their particular vision on Internet users worldwide. 

Media corporates are annonyed that people are being 'distracted' by the diversity of the internet. They want to ensure that everyone goes to their sites for information. CNN does not want to have to compete with the thousands of alternative news channels. Through putting pressure on ICANN, it is possible for the CNNs of this world to get their way.

Ofcourse, those who are highly technical will say the net cannot be controlled and they are probably right. But what good is it if a majority of the people - through shear convenience ends up only accessing the dominant content. The people who want to control the internet aren't stupid - they will always allow the alternative content to live on the net but in a very very marginalised way. All we need to do is look at the community media example in Australia. Sure, there is community tv and community radio... 

We have a chance to ensure that the net never gets to that stage where there is a marginalised and highly promoted zones of content. The most fantastic thing about the internet is that all content is equal and everyone has equal access to that content. This feature needs to be defended from ICANN and more significantly, the corporations and governments which want to control and direct ICANN.

So ICANN are having their next round of meetings in Melbourne from the 10th to 13th March at the Melbourne Exhibition & Convention Centre (opposite the Crown Casino). http://www.icann.org/melbourne/

According to ICANN watchers Melbourne was chosen because the ruling American faction inside ICANN thought it was at the end of the
world so that few troublemakers would show up (same with that WTO in Quatar proposal). 

The purpose of this email is to encourage you as indiividuals or groups to investigate ICANN as a matter of urgency. Unfortunately, there are not many people who seem to be raising a voice about ICANN. Most of its opposition are based overseas. 

ICANN and its meeting needs to be investigated by the union movement, the left, the anarchists, and all community groups in general who do not want to see the cyberspace corporatised in the same way our public space has become. If we are to reclaim our public space, we need to organise in another space. At the moment, the virtual space is providing that venue to some degree and lets not wait until that space is also taken away from us.

It would be fantastic if a progressive union or group puts in some effort in to organising an action. The main idea probably would not be to shut it down but to say to ICANN that there is a critical mass of co

Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold {AT} nettime.org