Ronda Hauben on 30 Oct 2000 00:05:40 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Nader is important, get rid of fear |
Jay Fenello <Jay@Fenello.com> writes: >Nader is a harbinger of things to come. >Today on ABC's "This Week," Ralph Nader once again >described how our government has been hijacked by big >business, and how its decision making is done behind >closed doors. >Having been personally involved in just one example >of this, I'd say he's right on target! It is good that the Nader campaign is bringing the issue of the corporate control of the US government out into the open. I saw someone campaigning for Nader outside in my neighborhood today and talked to him for a few minutes. He said there would be a parade for Nader in the neighborhood next Saturday and asked me to join. I told him that it was good Nader was bringing out the problem of the corporate control of the US government. But that Nader had gone along with the privatization of the Infrastructure to the Internet. That when I had tried to correspond with Jamie Love on the issue of the support for ICANN, Love told me that I should read what Nader had written. I had and it was a problem. The person campaigning said that he would expect Nader to be against the privatization of the Internet's infrastructure since he was against the privatization of the air waves. He said he would look into the situation. The creation of ICANN instead of the US governmwent figuring out what was the needed government and scientific role in the development of the Internet, or supporting and encouraging others to try to sort this all out, is a serious problem. Also my original proposal that was submitted to the Dept of Commerce before they contracted with ICANN was a proposal to take on to determine the problem that had to be solved. It didn't seem that folks close to Nader ever gave this proposal any serious thought, even though they had to have known about it. It's still online at http://www.columbia.edu/~rh120/other/dns_proposal.txt and its also online at the Dept of Commerce. Also I know someone who asked the Nader campaign about the position about ICANN and he was told he would get an answer, and he never got an answer. Why didn't Jamie Love ever make an effort to look at the proposals submitted to the Dept of Commerce along with the ICANN proposal? This is an important issue for the Nader campaign to take on and yet the opposite seems to be the case. Instead of opposing ICANN, it has seemed that Nader and Jamie Love have encouraged the labor movement to get behind the creation of new TLD's. So thought the Nader campaign is very important and it has done something important, if it goes along and keeps the silence about the privatization of the Internet's infrastructure or if it encourages ICANN to create new TLD's and to be accepted, then it doesn't stand up very well under the heat. When the US government was trying to privatize atomic energy, the labor movement (I read in Donald Price's telling at least in his book Government and Science) opposed the privatization and that led the US government to form an atomic energy commission within government and that was a better situation that letting the private sector take over atomic energy development and policy. It seems that Nader, instead of encouraging the labor movement to oppose the privatization of the Internet's infrastructure, he has been promoting their support of it. There is a need to figure out how to have an international public structure for the administration of the Internet's Infrastructure, but not a private administration like ICANN. I have found some helpful precedents to give an idea what is needed, and my proposal was a way to start some international collaboration to find a way to identify what was needed. I wonder why the Nader campaign has been silent on this issue or has gone along supporting ICANN. Ronda ronda@panix.com http://www.ais.org/~ronda/ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold