ExsulVolumnius on Tue, 25 Apr 2000 05:21:22 +0200 (CEST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] The Revolt of Zimbabwean Masses


                          The Revolt of the Zimbabwean Masses
                           Part I: How Did It All Begin?
                               by  Lorenzo Peña
        (18 April 2000 - on the 20th anniversary of Zimbabwe's independence)
                   <http://www.eroj.org/urbiorbi/zimbabwe.htm>
           <http://www.netlink.co.uk/users/er/urbiorbi/zimbabwe.htm>
                   ________________________________________
     Such as look down upon the masses with disdain or, at best, condescension
are amazed by recent events in Zimbabwe and tend to view the whole issue as
merely an attempt by aging and increasingly discredited President Robert Mugabe
to regain popularity.
     Several years ago sundry people blamed President Mugabe for failing to
redress the lingering injustices of the colonial era. The authorities in Harare
replied that such a dismal legacy could not be reversed or altered overnight.
But of course nobody had demanded an immediate overturn of the whole fabric of
social relations in Zimbabwe. We had only complained over social immobilism
many years after independence.
     Now, at last, things are changing. Such an apparently sudden upheaval is
portrayed in the media as the outcome of political manoeuvering by the Harare
government, which has set its retinue in motion in order to wrench some land
from the white owners and thus claim at least limited success in social
progressive reforms the Zimbabwe people had, for decades, yearned for.
     In fact, though, things are much more complicated. The main actors are the
masses themselves. It is the poor people of the Zimbabwean countryside, old and
young, female and male, not just the liberation war veterans, who little by
little have come to think that enough is enough and that the government's
tactics of procrastination and vague promises of future legislation cannot be
trusted or relied upon any longer.
                          BUT HOW DID IT ALL BEGIN?
     In recent precolonial times two main ethnic groups used to inhabit
Zimbawe: the Ndebele and the Shona. According to Shona oral traditions, their
priest Chaminuka predicted a white invasion and was put to death by the Ndebele
ruler, Lobengula, on account of such a dangerous prophecy. Whether that was
true or not, Lobengula -- who was the Ndebele king at the outbreak of the
Anglo-Ndebele war of 1893 -- had went to great lengths to appease the
increasingly aggressive British imperialists and the white settlers attacking
Zimbabwe from the South (the then independent Boer states and, mainly, the Cape
British-dominated colony, led by Cecil Rhodes).
     Lobengula had mounted the throne in 1870 and already at that stage had
granted a mining concession to Thomas Baines of Durban Gold Mining Co. in order
to diffuse white intervention.
     However, the Europeans grew more and more threatening and covetous in
later years, especially after the Berlin imperialist conference of 1884-5,
which unleashed the scramble for colonial domination into the whole black
continent.
     In 1885 the British crown imposed a so-called protectorate on neighbouring
Bechuanaland; upon which white settlers embarked on an invasion of the land.
     In 1888 Rhodes sent his partner and agent Rudd to compel Lobengula to
acquiesce to an important mining concession. This Lobengula did only to realize
(too late) that the white invaders had thus driven the thin end of their wedge.
Lobengula was thus pushed into reluctant resistance by white greedy rapacity.
     Despite the Ndebele king's repeal of the concession, Rhodes -- supported
by the British crown -- enacted a charter of the newly created British South
Africa Company investing it with an array of rights (rights that of course the
British were not legally entitled to exercise or to bestow on anybody): the
right to make treaties, to pass laws and to subject the natives to its police
force, as well as to make grants of minerals and land to white settlers.
Nothing of the sort had been countenanced by the Rudd concession, even before
it was revoked by the Zimbabwean authorities.
     Thereupon, each settler was given a 3,000 acre farm (plus 15 gold-mining
claims) -- by those who had no legal right to give what was not theirs.
     In 1891 the London Government officially recognized the Company's
occupation and issued the Mashonaland Order in Council. A British governor took
possession of the Zimbabwean land on behalf of Queen Victoria. The leader of
the white settlers' Column, Dr. Jameson, behaved with ruthless harshness,
imposing forced labour upon the Shona populations, which hitherto had almost
willingly accepted white invasion as a means of escaping from Ndebele
supremacy.
     When the whites found out that no gold was to be discovered there, they
became more brutal and predatory. Each white settler was then granted a 6,000
acres farm.
     Lobengula could not just stand by. He was no valorous patriot, but he
could not renounce a feeling of national dignity. He would not become a mere
stooge at the hands of the white settlers. Upon an incident at Fort Victoria
in 1893, the British troops invaded the whole Zimbabwean territory. Thus began
the Ndebele War of Resistance of 1893.
     The Zimbabweans were defeated by superior European gun-fire at the two
battles of Shangani River and Mbembezi. The conquerors took advantage of the
natives' inner divisions, with people of the low castes remaining passive and
even some traitors helping the invaders.
     The ferocious oppression by the British conquerors became so appalling in
later years that it probably outdid most other colonial situations in the late
19th century (barring King Leopold's rule in Congo which killed some 10 million
people -- perhaps the greatest genocide in history).
     The aftermath of the British conquest in Zimbabwe was that cattle was
seized from the natives, their land taken, and such soil plots as were left to
them they were often forcibly prevented from ploughing and sowing, since the
Blacks were subjected to tax-collection and coerced labour in white-owned
farms.
     Famine ensued. Three years later, the Zimbabwean people rose up in arms
against the colonial yoke.
     By March 1899 the whites had seized 15,762,364 acres. Woeful though the
predicament of the land labourers was under such a colonialist occupation, the
most heart-rendering plight was the miners'. Between 1900 and 1920 18,000 black
miners were to die in Zimbabwe, the victims of bad food, flogging, awful
dwelling conditions, accidents and disease. After several strikes, a Master and
Servants Law was enacted by the British Royal authorities making it a criminal
offense to break a labour contract.
     The Zimbabwean people revolted against their white masters. In March 1896
huge masses of the population rose up in arms under a variegated leadership,
including Mkwati, a shona ex-slave and a Mwari High God priest. That rebellion
is called in Zimbabwean history `the Chi Murenga of 1896'.
     The uprising was crushed by the British, who to that end resorted to
dynamiting broad areas wherein the natives' defensive caves had become
militarily unassailable. The battle of Gwindingwi, which went on for two months
(August and September 1896), was one of the greatest feats of that war.
     Many leaders of the uprising, including the priests Kagubi and Nehenda,
were captured and put to death. A huge number of prisoners were executed.
     However, after the 1896 insurrection the white colonizers became a little
more cautious. (The hut tax was set at 1 pound rather than, as initially
planned, 2 pounds.)
     New revolts took place in later years, though. Mapondera was the head of
a Shona rebellion in 1900-1903. He was also defeated at long last and,
mistreated, died in jail.
     (Main source: _A HISTORY OF AFRICA, 1840-1914_, by Michael Tidy with
Donald Leeming, London: E. Arnold, 1981.)
__________________________________________________________________________
Should you wish us to never again send you any future announcement, please
be so kind as to fill in the form <http://www.eroj.org/unsubscr.htm>. (In case
you have already done so, please do accept hour humble apologies: we have
undergone an informatic glitch, but we hope no such mistake will be repeated)
__________________________________________________________________________
Si Ud desea que no le volvamos a mandar nada, tenga la bondad de 
rellenar el formulario <http://www.eroj.org/unsubscr.htm>



_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold